
George Boole (1815-1864) developed an algebra for logic, which is
still in use today : ANDs, ORs, NOTs, EXORs, etc.

Giuseppe Peano (1858-1932) developed a formalization of arithmetic
consisting of:
1. an alphabet
(symbols)
2. a grammar
(rules that describe which sequence of symbols are valid)
3. axioms
(sequence of symbols assumed to be true)
4. rules of
inference (how one sequence may be converted to another)

David Hilbert (1862-1943) influenced mathematics the early part of
the 20th century as many graduate students tried to solve his list of 23
problems (1900). In particular, the last problem, known as “Hilbert’s Tenth
Problem,” had a great impact. It asks if a computational procedure (algorithm)
exists to determine whether a set of Diophantine (Diophantos of Alexandria, 3rd
century, AD) equations has a solution.
Meanwhile, the
work of Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) and Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947) ,
Principia Mathematica (1910-1913), attempted to totally formalize all
mathematical thinking.

Kurt Godel
(1906-1978) proved that there would always be statements of a formal system
that cannot be determined to be true or false by the axioms of the formal system
alone. This is known as the “incompleteness theorem.”


Alan Mathison
Turing (1912-1954) presented a rigorous definition of the term “computation.”
All digital computers of today are manifestations of his “Universal Turing
Machine” (or UTM). The UTM consists of a tape containing data and instructions,
which are written using symbols of an alphabet, according to a grammar. It
operates according to the instructions, finally producing a result – or perhaps
never stopping. This is what Hilbert was asking: how do we know that the computation
will halt? (known as the halting problem).
The Millennium
Project of the Center for Cognitive Sciences at the
Principia
Mathematica begat Godel, and Godel begat Turing, and Turing of course begat all
manner of things important to cognitive science...
Roger Penrose (born 1931) argued why computational approaches alone
can never duplicate mathematical thinking – quantum consciousness!

This site http:
http://wap03.informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de/weber1/turing/
has a TM simulator. Try the following programs:
Alternating sequence. Use tape data 1000..01
1,1,1,1,>
1,0,2,0,>
2,0,2,0,>
2,1,3,1,<
3,0,3,0,<
3,1,2,1,>
Add two numbers. Use tape data 11..1011..10
1,1,1,1,>
1,0,2,1,>
2,1,2,1,>
2,0,3,_,<
3,1,H,0
Computing machines may be built around mechanical or
electro-mechanical devices (see Zuse). Turing worked on the Colossus during WW-II.

Simple
power supply, switch, load circuit.

Control
input (switch) is now 'relayed' to the load circuit.

Load
is energized when the switch is not pressed. Implements the logical
"NOT" operation.

The
basic building block can be used as a non-inverting buffer, or an inverter
(logical NOT operator).

Many
different types of switches may be activated by the relay.

A
two-stage relay circuit. Works but logically not very useful. (Sometimes used
to activate a larger relay from a smaller one.)

Circuit
implements combinatorial logic...

...that
could have been implemented also by simple switches.

A
sequential logic circuit that cannot be implemented by simple switches. This is
called a "latch" circuit, because the output latches on to the input.
Once activated, the output cannot be turned off (pull the plug?).

The
electrical circuit diagram readily translates into an equivalent "ladder
logic" schematic. Ladder logic is used by industry to describe control
operations. It is a visual description of both the hook up diagram and the
control task it performs.

Common gates.

Schematic of a latched "ON" button.

A Set-Reset (SR) flip-flop is a bi-stable device. If both buttons are pressed,
the output is on. It is said that the "on button dominates."

The inverter (NOT) is used so that when both buttons are pressed, the output is
off. Now the off button dominates – useful if the off button is an emergency
stop!
Sequential
logic circuits that rely on a “clock” signal play a central role in
contemporary machine computing.

Use the Boolean Expression Evaluator to study the behavior of this circuit.
Sequential logic outputs are a function of not only the current
inputs, but also of the past inputs. In certain cases, the outputs may also be
a function of initial conditions. This implies that the system as a whole
“remembers” the sequence of states visited. Hence, sequential logic is said to
have memory. Obviously, the past inputs are not explicitly presented to the
system. This would require an external memory, defeating the entire purpose.
Rather, some of the outputs are redirected as inputs. Since the outputs were
functions of previous inputs, so are the current outputs dependent on the
previous inputs. Think about it -- ingenious, eh?
Turing also
worked at
Hilbert’s Tenth
Problem was finally resolved in 1970 by Yuri Matiyasevich: there can be no
algorithm that would systematically determine if a system of Diophantine equations
has a solution.
Penrose worked
on the tiling problem, which is often used as an example for non-computability.
Diophantos
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Diophantus.html
Boole
http://www-groups.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Boole.html
Peano
http://www-groups.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Peano.html
Hilbert
http://www.phy.bg.ac.yu/web_projects/giants/hilbert.html
Russell
http://www.mcmaster.ca/russdocs/russell1.htm
Whitehead
http://alfred.north.whitehead.com/
http://alfred.north.whitehead.com/wwanw_exam.htm
Godel
http://www.logic.at/kgs/home.html
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Godel.html
A nice summary
of the proof may be found at the web site http://www.miskatonic.org/godel.html
Turing
http://www.turing.org.uk/turing/scrapbook/machine.html
http://www.turing.net/Alan.Turing.html
http://pass.maths.org.uk/issue5/turing/
http://wap03.informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de/weber1/turing/
http://www-lns.mit.edu/~dsw/turing/turing.html
Penrose
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
http://dhushara.tripod.com/book/quantcos/penrose/penr.htm
Principia
Mathematica
Still on sale!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0521626064/jonradel/002-7938526-8278462
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/whitehead/
On Formally
Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems (Godel's
proof)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0486669807/jonradel/002-7938526-8278462
http://www.chaos.org.uk/~eddy/math/Godel.html
http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~dale/godel/godel.html